Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

With exploring, the starting state should only affect which local-maximum you end up in. Therefore you need to make an argument that a random starting state is likely to end up in a higher local-maximum than a non-random starting state.

There is always a starting state; using a random one only means you don't know what it is.



Exactly, but why do so many people seem to have a problem with this? Sounds like a political problem to me instead of a scientific one.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: