Serious discussion of revisions feels like a core part of jurisprudence.

What if constitutional language-seeking behavior were more human, and evolved with us?

It is philosophical, but psychologically healthy to recognize what needs governing now. Is a government contextually present more able to fit reality?

If no question is stupid. "A wise man can learn more from a foolish question than a fool can learn from a wise answer."..... Why is it felt governing and law is unquestionable? Sometimes our definition of stable is wrought?

A different angle, in same direction. Better constituting our futures is important.