So you're missing a huge issue with something like this.

Most other AI guided systems (which are basically all offshoots of large language models in some way) are used as tools by people who are already familiar with the subject matter at the AI manipulates, which means that they can essentially fact check it.

Using the AI as a teacher implies that you are a student with virtually little to no understanding of the subject matter, which means you have no way to sanity check if the AI messes up and gives you incorrect information. You could end up with a deeply flawed understanding of the actual domain you wish to become an expert in.

This, given the current state of things I belive that AI can be used, at most, as a more engaging/interactive piece of material to be used with the supervision of an actual teacher. The conversation that a student might have with GPT3 model will be coherent most of the time (and probably factually correct as well) but supervision from a teacher will always be needed to catch those cases where incorrect info is returned by the model.

I still believe that a bunch of AI-enabled edtech tools will bloom out in the foreseeable future, just nowhere near anything usable by the student withouth supervision.

This is just as much of an issue with real teachers.

real teachers you can question and determine if they're talking out of their asses or actually know. AIs will lie

Jill Watson was developed at GaTech to support their OMSCS program, though I haven't heard any updates in a while.

https://pe.gatech.edu/blog/meet-jill-watson-georgia-techs-fi...

IIRC from my EdTech course, work is being done in this area but nothing to my knowledge at the "personalized instructor" level you're asking about here, with being able to explain concepts in simple terms and answer complex questions, but my experience predates GPT3 and the like.

Think Replit Ghostwriter fits the bill best. https://replit.com/site/ghostwriter

With the right prompts, it's pretty easy to get GPT-3 or its open source clones to explain complex jargon in layman terms, as seen here: https://twitter.com/jajoosam/status/1545364935395639299?t=FS...

There is a book on the topic: Diamond Age. Well worth a read.

In reality, we're nowhere near there.

Also, one of the themes of the book is how different the outcomes are for Nell, who had a real narrator, and the children who had an artificial narrator. (Although the content was AI-generated in both cases.)

But I agree, it’s a great book. One of my favorites.

I work in a relevant field. AI powered personalized instructor was always around the corner like how autonomous car was around the corner since 2016. And we understand less about ‘understanding’ than driving cars.

What benefit is there for a personalized AI teacher, vs a set of good-quality online resources and an active QA board?

ive never gotten into the habit of posting on any kind of board because usually "stupid" questions get deleted or flamed :S. Thus, i just read the online resources like you suggested and writhe in frustration of hard to answer questions. you know?

Maybe not what you're after, but there are AIs that can analyse your chess games and tell you why you suck.

An AI that could teach you anything would need to be generally intelligent.

Open AI Da Vinci playground is the closest there is at the moment