Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

begs the question is just so much more elegant and expressive than raise or prompts that it is really sort of funny to assert otherwise.

Having said this, on the internet, I must now defend it.

to beg in conversation is of course more energetic than raising or prompting. When you beg it is urgent, a question that has been raised can be tabled for later, a prompt can be ignored as we point at a different reporter we know is more likely to ask about how this affects the First Lady, but if the question is being begged it demands an answer from us.

To beg calls forth the image naturally, for those who think in images, of a beggar. A beggar has moral urgency, they need what we have to give, and that moral urgency of the image is transferred to the question implied by the subject of discussion.

To prompt or raise a question have absolutely no visual analogue, they are lifeless, bloodless, and should be buried before rotting.

Why do you think that this more common usage of beg the question has come into play? It's not (necessarily) ignorance, I believe the cause is that the phrasing in English far better supports what is wanted and this allowed the phrase itself to spread among the population as a tool for expressing thought.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: