Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

But they're not equal to 1, for example a degree is 0.01745...


1° is actually 0.0174... radians. 1 radian is 57.295...°. The choice of unit to specify an angle is arbitrary.


But the angle is an adimensional unit (it's the ratio of two distances, one along the circumference and one along the radius) so 1 rad = 1. Therefore 1 degree is 0.0174... radians but it is also just 0.0174.


No, you're describing one particular way to measure angles. Radians express such a ratio, but degrees don't. 1° is not a ratio between distance along a circumference and radius, it's a ratio between amount rotated and complete revolution. 1° actually stands for 1/360 (of a revolution).

Which is why it's important to add the unit after the measurement. If someone tells you an angle measures 1, can you tell whether it's 1/360 of a revolution or the angle that would be formed by traveling along a circumference a distance equal to the radius of the circle?


Angles in the SI are a ratio of two lengths (and solid angles are a ratio of two surfaces), so degrees are also a ratio of two lengths. 1 degree is a ratio of pi/180=0.01745, which happens to be 1/360th of a revolution; and you have to write down the unit to indicate the multiplicative factor. But writing down radians is just for clarity.


I don't understand the debate, radians & degrees are just 2 proportional units, just like meter & kilometer




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: