You speak of living in the city as somehow being better for the climate?
I wasn't but I'd think yes it's better. Collectively more 'efficient' w/ infra & logistic scaling.
My dream is to live in the country side so that I can grow my own food, have animals and take water from the earth and not being as dependent on a big functioning society.
Me too! Dearly. While trying to minimize driving around, and live the most 'organic' possible (Self water, dry toilet. etc..)
I will live pretty far from a big city though, not by choice but because I can't afford to live closer
Can't blame you.
I am not a boomer, so I guess your anger is not directed towards me, but you should be more careful of hating on people in which you don't know.
'Boomer' is mainly a lifestyle. I'm not rabid at an age group. I perfectly know some boomer-aged people are well aware and caring and acting. For the others, there is no time anymore to be 'careful'.
People will do whatever is nice and economical. If you want people to make certain choices, the easiest way is to make the "wrong" choice uneconomical.
> I wasn't but I'd think yes it's better. Collectively more 'efficient' w/ infra & logistic scaling.
I completely disagree. People used to live on the country side and take care of both earth and tools. Today, labor is expensive and materials are cheap so people will toss away stuff. City life is all about just consuming and it will automatically lead to people getting disconnected from the stuff that truly matters.
What bothers me most is when I travel outside my country and realize there is practically no recycling, even if it is very easy to do so.
