Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Indeed. ICT teachers have a curriculum to stick to, whether they like it or not. If that curriculum, dictated by everyone from the head of department to the local authority, says "create a crappy powerpoint app" and the student doesn't do that, then he's failed.

I remember the painful discussion I had with my lecturer at college regarding the website module on my AVCE ICT course (college level; 16-18). I had a choice: I could create a website putting everything I knew about semantics and accessibility etc into it, using valid HTML & CSS etc etc etc... or I could pass the course (using Frontpage + frames).

It's a shit system (I've seen it both sides of the fence - student and IT support) but getting teachers to the level of your average HN user just for the sake of 1 in every few hundred students is a waste of their time.



Its a waste of a drone's time. But nurturing that 1-in-100 student can be a more powerful social effect than passing 99 adequate IT students.

There are other choices. Help them move to the CS track. Get them mentors outside of school. Suggest further reading or activities.

But to just drop them a failing grade and ignore them? That's the act of a drone.


A more powerful social effect maybe, but that teacher won't keep his job. It sounds like this kid already knows what course he'll pick for uni, if he's going, and the teacher doesn't know the area at all, so can't help in any way.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: