Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

In practice, the files can be viewed just fine in any standard-compliant viewer without any awareness of custom tags.

Source: I wrote the DICOM viewer & anonymizer for Radiopaedia (okay, most of the heavy lifting is done by cornerstone.js).



For certain definitions of "just fine". Some manufacturers will use a private tag to hold the same information that's meant to be in a standard tag—and even sometimes put different values in the two, with the private tag being correct.


> Some manufacturers will use a private tag to hold the same information that's meant to be in a standard tag...

Agree! Also some applications have "special" features that rely on data stored in private tags which, of course, you don't have any idea how to use.


Viewer of what? Dicom can contain other things than just nD imagery.

Also, the difficulty in my experience is the getting data back in part; getting data out is usually a lot easier (you don't need to care about those tags).




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: