Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Critic reviews are prescriptive: what they think the masses should watch.

I think this really depends on the critics. Lots of critics never explicitly articulate a philosophy—or, if they do, I don't bother to seek it out—but, for one notable example, Roger Ebert explicitly subscribed to the philosophy that you should review a movie based on whether it achieves its goals, not on whether its goals are the same as your goals.



Ok, but he did also penalize films for having bad goals. Case in point The Human Caterpillar.


Centipede.

I... think I just won the prize of most useless nitpick ever.


hah, well just goes to show Ebert's 0 star review worked and I never watched it.


I miss Ebert. He never cheated and was clear as to which standard he was judging a movie by.


I rarely agreed with him. But I enjoyed his reviews. The best part of his show was when he'd bicker with Siskel.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: