Above a certain percentage it's going to poison human-generated content too. You will have to discern between ai-generated content, ai-influenced-human generated content and genuine human-generated content.
One could argue it's already happening. How many of the people we talk to everyday get their facts from SEO-spam websites and Google instant answers (which often sources its content from such websites)? Even if we avoid AI-generated content, we might be gettting fed it by proxy.
Human filtering of AI creativity might work, but deepfakes mismatch with that. Personally I decided to make it a pattern that I unsubscribe from channels that use deepfakes since I saw Internet Historian using it and possibly adding to the already crippling confusion regarding UAPs. - IH is not a credible source anyway, but you can easily use the clips they produced without attribution.
I think the world will be a better place if everybody follows a similar pattern. The only reason to use deepfakes is if the victim who's identity is being stolen is not cooperating with you. - It's a new way to violate a person's integrity and their right to agency in our already fading grasp of reality. You could probably gaslight your girlfriend with it, if you are incomprehensibly evil.
>You could probably gaslight your girlfriend with it, if you are incomprehensibly evil.
I'm honestly a bit more concerned with people gaslighting courts.
The technology isn't going away, unfortunately. Society will have to adapt to these new invasive norms, as they already have time and again in the past.
One could argue it's already happening. How many of the people we talk to everyday get their facts from SEO-spam websites and Google instant answers (which often sources its content from such websites)? Even if we avoid AI-generated content, we might be gettting fed it by proxy.