Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Why not simply hire someone on a 3-year contract with the understanding that the first x months will be paid for but spent in learning a new skill and the other x months will be spent in earning back the course + paid hours?

There should be a strict rule in the contract, that ending it before the 3 years are over will have a pricey consequence, so that you are incentivized to only sign up if you understand the work involved and will not quit after just doing the training.



EPAM did this in Hungary for example. A friend went through this. (The training was a lot of Java classes/courses, pretty in depth.)


They put their projects on their resumes. I used to work with a lot of EPAM developers, they were all excellent.

They also write internal tools as learning projects.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: