You know what should be practically illegal? Foisting yet another web framework without a standardized reference implementation. A sort of rosetta stone or PLEAC for web frameworks.
- login
- registration
- db views / grids
- forms
- api invocation
- navigation
- menus
- tabs
- lightbox
- forum
- wiki
- ecommerce
etc, etc, etc... I'm leaving out probably about 50 things.
Yeah, not just a "widget zoo" or something similar.
The reference implementation should be pretty big. Annoyingly big. It shouldn't be easy. Don't foist your web framework and push it until you do the work to show how it does and does not work well. It should have four or five levels of complexity in menus, forms, grids, navigation, tabs, and the like.
Because at this point there are likely several thousand web frameworks. Java alone likely has 200 since the old days of Struts.
- login
- registration
- db views / grids
- forms
- api invocation
- navigation
- menus
- tabs
- lightbox
- forum
- wiki
- ecommerce
etc, etc, etc... I'm leaving out probably about 50 things.
Yeah, not just a "widget zoo" or something similar.
The reference implementation should be pretty big. Annoyingly big. It shouldn't be easy. Don't foist your web framework and push it until you do the work to show how it does and does not work well. It should have four or five levels of complexity in menus, forms, grids, navigation, tabs, and the like.
Because at this point there are likely several thousand web frameworks. Java alone likely has 200 since the old days of Struts.