Whats the point? You'll just debunk it with a bs "fact check"[1] article that links to outdated information or quotes people with outdated information and call it a day.
When the reality is:
- Spike proteins from the virus and the vaccine are in-arguably cytotoxic[2] (but the low load has not lead to any long term negative effects and you should still get vaxxed).
- Spike proteins do not stay near the injection site.[3][4] (only 20% of the dose is found to remain in the injection site after 48h)
The thing that fucks me off so much about this censorship from youtube is that it leads to the fact checkers becoming gospel, the same fact checkers that have been found to be paid shills of big pharma.[5] Even the fact check article I link to here links to a youtube clip where this is all discussed in detail, only it doesn't discuss it in detail be cause its only a clip. A clip that was created to avoid youtubes filters. The full video[6] covers all of this in detail.
> Whats the point? You'll just debunk it with a bs "fact check"
There's a PhD waiting for someone who can do an "influence analysis" of points and counter-points diffusing through articles, social media debates, fact-checkers, counter-articles, etc. Including methodologies to differentiate bots, paid PR firms, machine learning analysis/targeting, and organic participants being influenced by all of the above.
Those who have been involved in a few of these debates can almost predict the graph of responses, as you did with the fact-check lookahead parser :)
As a starting point, there's a social network analysis (100+ page PDF) of the "Covid Network Complex". One could work outwards from some of those nodes, to track lobbying and media influence. https://www.disclose.tv/the-covid-network-an-analysis/
Thank you for taking the time to put this all together and further your points. Jeez, the future looks dark when it comes to inquiry of truth. I've had discussions with other engineers who are supposed to be sufficiently trained about critical thinking and I see a very clear party-line ideologies getting mixed into their conscience.
It's partly due to underestimating the sophistication and incentives of the apparatus that has been constructed to influence organic humans, especially for the engineers who are essential to the construction of future digital societies.
Thanks for pointing all of this out. It's much better if we publicize the vaccine's potential risks in full context and alongside the much more significant benefits. If the anti-vaxxers are the only ones talking about inconvenient facts, a lot of people are going to go down a bad path.
> - Spike proteins from the virus and the vaccine are in-arguably cytotoxic[2] (but the low load has not lead to any long term negative effects and you should still get vaxxed).
ok sure but a high viral load is probably not comparable to the vaccine so we should use this information accordingly and be mindful of the dosages right? This doesn't seem very scary at all to me
