I agree. I also like that such journals can be made. I also would like to have more from the areas of astrophysics, philosophy of mathematics, molecular biology, quantum physics etc. written by actual experts in these fields who, for some reason or another, do have certain opinions, backed up by research, that diverges from the mainstream for various reasons, including but not limited to cultural ones.
I think that the articles about philosophy and ethics are also good to have; as other comments say this is what the existing writers know, and so I hope that writers who do physics, mathematics, etc will also write more.
(I also like that the articles are available as HTML and XML as well as PDF, to allow for reformatting and such things; I dislike many things about PDF. However, then about XML, it necessarily is using the XML both for the data and for the text. I think that XML is OK for text, and not as good for data (such as the data in the <front> block) (there are better formats).)
Some of my own ideas are also controversial, although I should leave it to the real scientists who have similar ideas to write about them, since their ideas will probably be better than my own. (Such a thing is not for sure, but it is likely.)
They mention formatting the document for submissing using Microsoft Word. Well, not everyone uses Microsoft Word, so they shouldn't require that. Also, since it is published as XML anyways, it might be better to use a subset of that, it can easily them be formatted as 12 point font double space or whatever (they do not specify specifically what font (e.g. serif, sans serif), but they could easily enough change the formatting to whatever font is wanted). (Also, writers who will write about mathematics might want to use TeX, anyways (or MathML; it seems they already declared the namespace for MathML, but I have not looked at all of the articles to see if they are used or not).)
I think that the articles about philosophy and ethics are also good to have; as other comments say this is what the existing writers know, and so I hope that writers who do physics, mathematics, etc will also write more.
(I also like that the articles are available as HTML and XML as well as PDF, to allow for reformatting and such things; I dislike many things about PDF. However, then about XML, it necessarily is using the XML both for the data and for the text. I think that XML is OK for text, and not as good for data (such as the data in the <front> block) (there are better formats).)
Some of my own ideas are also controversial, although I should leave it to the real scientists who have similar ideas to write about them, since their ideas will probably be better than my own. (Such a thing is not for sure, but it is likely.)
They mention formatting the document for submissing using Microsoft Word. Well, not everyone uses Microsoft Word, so they shouldn't require that. Also, since it is published as XML anyways, it might be better to use a subset of that, it can easily them be formatted as 12 point font double space or whatever (they do not specify specifically what font (e.g. serif, sans serif), but they could easily enough change the formatting to whatever font is wanted). (Also, writers who will write about mathematics might want to use TeX, anyways (or MathML; it seems they already declared the namespace for MathML, but I have not looked at all of the articles to see if they are used or not).)