> Even the buyer’s agent gets paid a percentage of the sale price, so if they try to lower it they’d be essentially working against themselves.
This makes me hopping mad. On what crazy world can they be considered the "buyer's" agent when their incentives are exactly opposite to those of the buyer?
It's like if defense attorneys were expected to argue for the prosecution, and everybody was okay with this.
This makes me hopping mad. On what crazy world can they be considered the "buyer's" agent when their incentives are exactly opposite to those of the buyer?
It's like if defense attorneys were expected to argue for the prosecution, and everybody was okay with this.