Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Or course they do

They can't not use it

That's the point

PWAs are crippled on the iPhone and the fact that the only browser available is Safari is not encouraging for developers, so native it's the only option to have a good experience on iOS

Apple does want you to develop native apps, because to make native apps you have to buy Apple hardware, Apple developer licenses and Apple devices to test them



> They can't not use it

They could very well not use it.

I’ve chosen not to develop (or learn how) iOS native apps. For now. Almost everything I want to do could be a web app and I’d take the cost of maintaining servers for shelf space, distribution and offline storage. I’d have to use email for notifications. Notifications are optional at point of consumption anyway so they can’t be relied upon, so this UX impairment is minor.

The PWA argument doesn’t work for me. Most of the features I might choose to use PWA abilities for can be implemented in other ways.


> They could very well not use it.

No, they can't or they would have done it already

> I’ve chosen not to develop (or learn how) iOS native apps

I've chosen to skip writing mobile apps entirely, that doesn't mean that the company I work for can ignore their users on iOS hence they can't ignore Apple store policies

> Most of the features I might choose to use PWA abilities for can be implemented in other ways.

That's the problem

When the actor that controls 50% of the market doesn't fully implement some standard to drive adoption of their closed platform, development becomes more costly

And it reflects on both development time and price for the end user




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: