Really interesting to study how macrumors.com loses all claims to objectivity when you read its wording with an editor's mindset:
> Shortly after Epic blatantly disregarded App Store policies
You don't need the adverb "blatantly" here.
You can just say "Epic disregarded App Store policies" and be able to claim to some reasonable objectivity. But as soon as you throw in "blatantly", you have clearly revealed yourself as a biased news source.
tim sweeney sent an email to tim cook and other apple execs telling them in advance that he was going to violate the contract and that he would fight them for years if necessary. so, no, it's not biased to call it blatant, they were extremely blatant about it.
> Shortly after Epic blatantly disregarded App Store policies
You don't need the adverb "blatantly" here.
You can just say "Epic disregarded App Store policies" and be able to claim to some reasonable objectivity. But as soon as you throw in "blatantly", you have clearly revealed yourself as a biased news source.