Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The thing is that this is a CSS change, which makes it declarative, which means it would almost certainly not "break" anything. Also, if it were made optional via a personal setting or by hooking into the user's system-level setting (https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/@media/pref...), it wouldn't even be a "change" for anyone who doesn't want it to be.

I understand and respect the general philosophy, but I fail to see how this particular request could be anything but a strict improvement.



I'm not in charge around here. My opinions about what I have observed over the last decade are just that: My opinions.

Feel free to prove me wrong and talk management into making such a change. But talking at me to convince me I'm wrong is probably not really the way to do that. I have zero decision-making authority in this matter.


I figured; I'm just presenting my counter-point in a place where hopefully management will see it :)


Well, let's hope you win. I'm disinclined to use browser extensions and the like, but would likely use a dark mode setting on HN if it existed. I use dark mode on Twitter and they have a really, really nicely done dark mode.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: