As usual, you continue to mention GUN one way or another in every post that is slightly related to CRDTs or decentralization. Your comment would actually fit this submission but I guess at this point people are so tired of your spamming that they had enough, even when it's relevant.
> To all interested in CRDTs: Marc Shapiro, @anne_biene
and I have set up a little CRDT community website. Lots of links to papers, blog posts, talks, and implementations. Contributions welcome!
> It is used in production by HackerNoon, non-profits like Internet Archive, & other large sites.
> Handling 10M+ monthly users.
I'm not sure I or you misunderstand "Just to be clear, Martin (site owner) added GUN to the list, not me" but it seems pretty clear that you prompted him to add GUN to the list, he didn't discover GUN on his own and then added it.
Mark, when you're gonna realize that this excessive spamming of GUN is not helping your case?
Yeah Mark is the only username I consistently recognize on HN other than Dang (the moderator), and it's because he promotes GUN without fail on just about every post I see about CRDTs, IPFS or decentralized anything. I wouldn't call it spam but it does get over the top.
Just for the record, I was already aware of GUN previously, and think it is a good project to include in the list. We had just forgotten about it when putting together this list of links. I guess I don't check HN all that often. ;)
That makes sense, thanks for adding that explanation. Just wanted to refute the statement that Mark didn't prompt you to add it, as we seem to be a bunch of HNers that are getting tired of the spam.
I get some hate my Open Source project & actively abuse downvotes/flagging to censor me.
But for every 1 hater there are 100s of hackers that have found, starred, used, or told me (in our chat channel) they were thankful they discovered GUN via HackerNews.
& HN guidelines encourage on-topic submissions & comments (https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html) "Anything that good hackers would find interesting ... anything that gratifies one's intellectual curiosity" even you have to admit that GUN discussions have sparked a lot of intellectual & algorithm chats.
Finally, you state I'm not spamming then say I am spamming. Spam is indiscriminate posting of something, yet your very own comment says "you always post GUN in discussions about CRDTs & decentralization." That is indeed on-topic according to HN policy.
Nearly every comment you post has some cunning (or not so cunning) promotional reference baked into it. Examples are legion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22252497. Your rare comments that don't include something like this are so boilerplate as to come across as shameless padding.
Given that we've banned countless other users for lesser abuses, and given the regularity with which this pattern devolves into user complaints and off-topic flamewars like the current thread and https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22499177, I think it's time to bite the bullet and ban your account. I don't really want to—which is no doubt why it's taken so long—but you're clearly not using this site in good faith, and enough is enough.
> I get some hate my Open Source project & actively abuse downvotes/flagging to censor me.
The "hate" (I'd say critique) is not against GUN as a project nor the code or the project itself. It's about you constantly posting about GUN.
> "you always post GUN in discussions about CRDTs & decentralization."
This is a bit unfair, that's not a direct quote of what I wrote, and I'm sure you know this. What I wrote is this: "every post that is slightly related to CRDTs or decentralization". The "slightly" part is important, because many of your comments mentioning GUN is on submissions not related to GUN at all. For example, if a submission is about Mastodon, I'm fairly certain I'll see a comment from you promoting GUN with your usual metrics.
Again, I have nothing against GUN itself, but people do get tired, even if it's interesting the first time, when someone continues to mention their project over and over again.
Others have mentioned this to you in the past as well (one example: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21383815) but it doesn't seem to stick. Maybe it's time for dang or other moderators to have a chat with you, if they haven't already.
Because I'm bored, here is some examples of comments you've made promoting GUN on unrelated posts with low effort content in order to get in a link to GUNs website (in the last 3 months) [maybe this list will help you realize what people are getting tired off]
Just to be clear, Martin (site owner) added GUN to the list, not me. Proof:
https://twitter.com/martinkl/status/1244672269395406849