Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Part not talked about is the wires in question for the tail also offer redundancy. Boeing wanted to cut time on manufacturing ran them all along the same section of the tail.


Interesting. I though that part was written in blood with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Airlines_Flight_232 (uncontained engine failure has hit a SPOF in the tail section, severing all hydraulics)


Feeding an automated system (with authority to crash the plane) from a single sensor is also known to be wrong. Controls engineering has taught failure modes and redundancy since the '60s. That didn't stop Boeing.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: