An interesting similarity can be drawn to today's digital social network. The main idea of the article is that coffee created cafe culture which in turn created a shift in the way people interacted and eased the exchange of ideas that eventually helped fuel the effort that led to fall of the empire.
In a way, Facebook created a
a similar shift in the way people communicate and made exchange of ideas easier. And this, arguable, has already supported several major real-world changes such as the Arab Spring, US election meddling, etc.
You forgot about Sri Lanka sectarian violence. If coffee (or tea) eases the exchange of ideas, social media eases the exchange and amplification of outrage.
In a way, Facebook created a a similar shift in the way people communicate and made exchange of ideas easier. And this, arguable, has already supported several major real-world changes such as the Arab Spring, US election meddling, etc.