> Surely if the numbers are correct that there's 60-70% accuracy with the cone (on any particular day? or possibly early on) then they could use real data.
I've noticed this as well. In reality, outside the cone seems to happen pretty regularly. So far outside the cone that it is significant as a practical matter is much more rare, at least in terms of the 48 hour cone.
I've noticed this as well. In reality, outside the cone seems to happen pretty regularly. So far outside the cone that it is significant as a practical matter is much more rare, at least in terms of the 48 hour cone.