Why are you trying to play the oppression olympics? We can care about multiple things at the same time.
Re: the legacy of slavery, this USA Today article is a good starting point[1].
Additionally, it's plainly obvious that black Americans today have much less wealth than white Americans. When whites settled in the US they were often given farm land or brought capital from abroad to start businesses. Black slaves had neither. When they were freed most became trapped in sharecropping arrangements (often for generations) that left them with little wealth. White Americans also benefited much more from the social programs of the early 20th century, such as New Deal work programs or subsidized home mortgages (look up "red lining"), that helped build wealth.
Also, you did not provide an example of black racism (which you have referenced in at least two posts as being equal to white racism).
> Why are you trying to play the oppression olympics? We can care about multiple things at the same time.
Right I am no longer interested in talking to you. Pretending something is whataboutism when I am trying to bring some perspective is a nonsense.
As for your stats. I've seen stats that if Black couples get married and have a household they do just as well as White couples from a similar background (not I am not going to trawl the internet to cherry pick some proof).
>A lso, you did not provide an example of black racism (which you have referenced in at least two posts as being equal to white racism).
I never claim it was equal, I never claimed to know the proportions. TBH I am getting quite fed up of someone constantly putting words into my mouth.
Your claim this isn't whataboutism is interesting based on a quick reading of your comment history. It sure doesn't appear that you actually care about these other issues or you're just trying to provide 'perspective'. Think about the ideals you associate yourself with before complaining that people are putting words in your mouth.
Whitewashing the proud boys:
> The proud boys are a strange white power group when they have prominent black members.
Claiming UKIP aren't racist because they are 'normal' people:
> Have you actually talked to many UKIP supporters? I've spoken to UKIP when they knocked on the door and they seemed like pretty normal people.
(I'm sure they're normal, but they're also racists)
Claiming apparent race-baiting:
> As for the the actual article you linked, the author herself has nice race-bait titles of work
Comparing criticisms of historic oppression in science to Nazi Germany:
> There is also ideas of "Colonial Science" or "White Science" which reminds me of movement of removing "Jewish" Science and Mathematics in preference to "Aryan Science" before World War II.'
I might not call you a racist, but you're sure carrying a lot of water for them.
Re: the legacy of slavery, this USA Today article is a good starting point[1].
Additionally, it's plainly obvious that black Americans today have much less wealth than white Americans. When whites settled in the US they were often given farm land or brought capital from abroad to start businesses. Black slaves had neither. When they were freed most became trapped in sharecropping arrangements (often for generations) that left them with little wealth. White Americans also benefited much more from the social programs of the early 20th century, such as New Deal work programs or subsidized home mortgages (look up "red lining"), that helped build wealth.
Also, you did not provide an example of black racism (which you have referenced in at least two posts as being equal to white racism).
[1] https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2018/02/08/co...