Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> "If we could get more of them doing it, it would be great," he joked. Karisoke's Vecellio, though, said actively instructing the apes would be against the center's ethos. "No we can't teach them," she said. "We try as much as we can to not interfere with the gorillas. We don't want to affect their natural behavior."

I would think that the main danger is in habituating the gorillas to humans, teaching them that we're safe when we're not. It may be better if any human interaction with them is aversive but not damaging, like pepper spray.



Definitely this moral grey area where ethics arguments on both sides are completely valid.

- Messing with natural behavior

vs

- Not being able to adequately defend oneself because we're stuck debating an ethics question

While it is a bit of a straw man attack - if this were humans, the answer would be clear.


Pepper spray is actually quite damaging.


I'd also think that there's a good chance that it would be damaging mostly to the human on the other end of the spray cannister.


It was an example, captain pedantic.


He is actually not a captain.


This comment is way underappreciated.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: