Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

They’re not even talking past each other (that would require a back and forth). Matthew responds to something pg didn't say.


If that’s the case, then Paul Graham chose a very poor subject as an example.


I agree, and he could and should have anticipated the reactions. But I read his clarifications and it looks like he argued with good intent.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: