> While a simple vector processor might execute one vector element at a time, element operations are independent by definition, and so a processor could theoretically compute all of them simultaneously. The widest data for RISC-V is 64 bits, and today’s vector processors typically execute two, four, or eight 64-bit elements per clock cycle.

So does this argument boil down to an inversion of control which in turn removes unnecessary instructions? It certainly sounds more elegant to my naive ISA understanding.

Can I ask, someone with hands on SIMD experience: does relinquishing control over exactly what and how many "vector" operations occur in a single clock make any real world difference?