Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This is unduly paternalistic: a story is whatever the HN community decides to pay attention to, even if that leaves out important stories or puts a spotlight on minor trivia.

> You know what would be an actual story though? If Google used Google DNS to spy on people. If anyone has concrete evidence that they're doing that, that is a big fucking deal.

I'm an optimist, but I'm also cynical enough to foresee the same complaints — it's not a story! everyone does it — if that came to pass.

Prevention is important because in real life you can almost never recoup the losses as easily. You can take it to the courts etc. but if your data leaks, it's out there, you can't undo it.



> This is unduly paternalistic

You're right, I'm sorry. I edited my post a bit to soften it.

> I'm an optimist, but I'm also cynical enough to foresee the same complaints

Well, maybe. I would hope not, specifically because Google has made previous guarantees that they do not use that data for spying.

It's different when it's your ISP, which already does tons of shady shit and buried somewhere in your TOS that they do this stuff.

I don't find it any more acceptable, but it would or at least should be a bigger story if Google was doing it with Google DNS.


You do realize your ISP can spy on any DNS records passing its routers with deep packet inspection right? Only DNS(HTTPS/TLS) can fix that.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: