> I feel this choice is a mistake for the company long term, they're putting resources into two very hot housing and real estate markets, that have no real draw (in my opinion) for technical employees.
The goal was never to optimize for employee housing or quality of life. The goal was to get concessions from already urban areas where 25000 engineers might want to live.
>If I were picking, I would have picked Atlanta and Detroit
Atlanta and Detroit have arguably lesser draw than NYC or DC.
The goal was never to optimize for employee housing or quality of life. The goal was to get concessions from already urban areas where 25000 engineers might want to live.
>If I were picking, I would have picked Atlanta and Detroit
Atlanta and Detroit have arguably lesser draw than NYC or DC.