That's definitely a better, more realistic process than what I described.
> Agreed, but an author's authority can still be undermined or reinforced by expert opinion.
That's a good point. Actually, that's probably how I will try to validate this book (or others like it): I'll give the 'okay', once I see some unassociated other researchers confirming that the work is good, conclusions drawn are not a stretch etc.
> Agreed, but an author's authority can still be undermined or reinforced by expert opinion.
That's a good point. Actually, that's probably how I will try to validate this book (or others like it): I'll give the 'okay', once I see some unassociated other researchers confirming that the work is good, conclusions drawn are not a stretch etc.