The problem with socialists policies like this is not necessarily the high taxes or the hostile takeover aspect of it.
The issue is the intent.
When socialists start doing stuff like this, it is clear what the long term goal is. The long term goal is to take the means of production from those who have it, though whatever politically palpable means necessary.
Sure, they start off doing a voluntary stock buyout program, but what happens when that program inevitably fails? (perhaps because it takes way to long to takeover a company, or merely that the company owners refuse to sell)
Will the socialists come to the conclusion that their socialist policy didn't work and reverse it?
No. What happens when socialism fails is that the socialists conclude that they didn't go far ENOUGH and then they double down on their mistakes.
In this situation, "doubling down" would be increasing the tax, forcing the owners to sell at a given price, and eventually straight up confiscation of the business.
When people in the government start yelling about how they want to take the means of production, even voluntarily, the proper response is to run away as fast as possible, and take your means of production with you, before they make it illegal to do so.
Looks to me like the Swedish people did, in fact, come to the conclusion their socialist policy didn't work and reversed it via the normal political process. According to the wiki, the Social Democrats retook power three years later and didn't attempt to reintroduce it.
That looks to me like pretty compelling historical evidence against the hypothesis that socialist experiments must necessarily slide down the slippery slope to full-on communism.
If anything the Nordic model and social democracy has failed not because it turned into communism, but because it only takes one government to undermine the system and privatize everything. Sweden today is liberal to the extent that it is regularly featured as an example in The Economist on how to privatize more things in the UK.
The issue is the intent.
When socialists start doing stuff like this, it is clear what the long term goal is. The long term goal is to take the means of production from those who have it, though whatever politically palpable means necessary.
Sure, they start off doing a voluntary stock buyout program, but what happens when that program inevitably fails? (perhaps because it takes way to long to takeover a company, or merely that the company owners refuse to sell)
Will the socialists come to the conclusion that their socialist policy didn't work and reverse it?
No. What happens when socialism fails is that the socialists conclude that they didn't go far ENOUGH and then they double down on their mistakes.
In this situation, "doubling down" would be increasing the tax, forcing the owners to sell at a given price, and eventually straight up confiscation of the business.
When people in the government start yelling about how they want to take the means of production, even voluntarily, the proper response is to run away as fast as possible, and take your means of production with you, before they make it illegal to do so.