> that actually have safe, strong consistency Based on what data? Even hazelcast... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		dyu- on Oct 8, 2017 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Hazelcast 3.8.3 > that actually have safe, strong consistency Based on what data? Even hazelcast had that same claim before they got exposed? I've only seen 2 systems that did rigorous in-house fault-tolerant testing (foundationdb and cockroachdb) and later when "jepsen-verified", they actually backed their claim or had few modifications to uphold their claim.

jodah on Oct 9, 2017 [–]

Atomix has a Jepsen test suite[1], which while not perfect, has helped fix the bugs that existed in the Raft implementation.

1: https://github.com/atomix/atomix-jepsen

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact