Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Microsoft introduced a high level of non-opt-out telemetry. That's what is controversial more than the telemetry itself.


On desktops, yes. Other companies have been moving everything to the web, where telemetry is easier and more thorough.


The problem is that Web exists in a sandbox. They can collect data about my usage of their website, full stop (large sites like Facebook and Google get around this, but that's not really telemetry). With desktop there's no way of knowing what's collected with "telemetry"


Furthermore, when people choose to "go online" or "use the Internet" that's a (mostly) conscious decision --- they know, more or less, that what they're doing is actually reaching out to some other machine somewhere else, and adjust their behaviour accordingly.

The related blurring of the distinction between what's local and what's remote, also irritates me greatly. E.g. making one UI search both local file names and contents as well as the Internet.


And that is the problem of using OSes with outdated security model from mainframe era.


To some large degree you need to be able to trust the people that provide software to you or you can't function.


If it's open source you don't have to trust them as much.

I function just fine with a mostly open stack.


It's also easier to block if you want to (on the web).

Not so easy when it's baked into the OS and software you use.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: