This will boil down to a debate on whether parliamentary privilege extends to being able to use resources of the state to advance goals which are not necessarily policy of the state or likely to become so, given where politician funding comes from.
Does hosting a server constitute "speech", in the sense that the writers of laws protecting MPs meant it?
This will boil down to a debate on whether parliamentary privilege extends to being able to use resources of the state to advance goals which are not necessarily policy of the state or likely to become so, given where politician funding comes from.
Does hosting a server constitute "speech", in the sense that the writers of laws protecting MPs meant it?
Makes for a great headline though.