I know Hacker news likes "Technically Correct - the Best kind of Correct" but in what sense is China 'ahead' here?
It may be obvious but there are plenty more Americans who are back and walking around on planet earth than there are Chinese astronauts who have been put into orbit.
please do not confuse current capability with the sum of achievements. USA has put multiple men on the surface of the Moon. what of it if it doesn't have a man-rated launcher now? SLS is a jobs program that's years from launching. Atlas V? not rated. Delta IV? being phased out and also not rated. Falcon 9? not rated. Antares? not rated. New Glenn? announced last month, hardware doesn't exist. ITS? you know the drill.
tell me in what way the current US capacity of launching men into space is ahead of China's?
USA is strongly profit oriented. There is very little profit in launching man to the space, but it you will look at the number of satellites in the space:
China: 218
US: 1341
http://www.n2yo.com/satellites/?c=&t=country
What does being 'rated' mean in this context, do the Chinese and American entities building spacecraft use uniform criteria for these ratings? Or is it simply what gets built and stamped that way by local varieties?
They use soviet technology on a 1960s era rocket to launch to a single room space station, all using massive government subsidies.
If the US wanted/needed to, they could put a man up tomorrow (seriously just strap a capsule to Antares 203). The only difference is that we are taking time to safely transition to a commercial market for spaceflight.
I'm not trying to knock China, more power to them, but they are definitely not "ahead".