Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It's not a fooling statement, it's a savvy political statement by a company's PR department that cares about self-interest.

You raise whether there is statistical significance about which is safer, autopilot or a typical driver. However it's worth noting that in a lawsuit the burden of proof is on the plaintiff.



Isn't it "balance of probabilities" for civil cases?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: