Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Hey Rob- that was probably unfairly harsh of me. I have tried to like the syntax for the last year and I've had trouble.

Anyway, I know you are a big contributer, do you mind showing me the discussion where we determined '*ngFor=' and '[(two-way)]=' was implemented to play nicely with WC? I would be interested in reading. Thanks!



seriously, not offended :) you get used to it working on frameworks :D

The longest (heated) discussion ever covers a lot of the reasoning: https://github.com/angular/angular/issues/133

More in depth design stuff here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kpuR512G1b0D8egl9245OHaG...

Demo: ng2 + google-youtube polymer element : http://plnkr.co/edit/yh0ACeu6g5n8D7YuhJvg?p=preview


Great, looking forward to reading these. Thanks!




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: