Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | subscribed's commentslogin

It's pretty clear who they should be reacting (victims/minors) and who they shouldn't (perpetrators).

They wasted months erasing Trump from that instead. So it's on them.


Gods, I had a flashback just from you mentioning that.

I had a reasonably simple problem to solve, slightly weird font and some 10 words in English (I actually only missed one or two blocks for missing letters to cover all I needed).

After a couple of days having almost everything (?) I just surrendered. This seems to be intentionally hostile. All the docs scattered across several repositories, no comprehensive examples, etc.

Absolutely awful piece of software from this end (training the last gen).



That might be intentional tbh, to make the database toxic to limit the spread.

At this point you're taking a piss, this is not a honest discussion stance.

Judges themselves complained about their own orders being ivolated/ignored. Repeatedly.


> you're taking a piss

"You are taking a piss" -- you are currently urinating.

"You are taking the piss" -- you are mocking me or this.


If someone violates a court order don’t they get arrested?? Can’t the judge pronounce the perpetrators should be arrested instead of just complaining?

This is exactly the breakdown of the system that people are sounding the alarm about.

Yeah, I find very capable but won't paying them exactly because they cheat /steal like this.

Is it though? Or is it attacking and killing American citizens in the street, trafficking legal residents to the notorious prisons, starving and killing the captured in the concentration camps.

Not sure how much of the heavy lifting is your "if" and the qualifier does, but I hope it's just sarcasm.


OS security was in the previous step:

> Intellexa also uses malicious ads on third-party platforms to fingerprint visitors and redirect those who match its target profiles to its exploit delivery servers.

-- https://www.malwarebytes.com/blog/news/2025/12/leaks-show-in...

Not blocking ads is bordering a self-destructive behaviour now.


"what's wrong? Oh, it literally paints a target on your face that can be shot at if you happen to be brown".

Maybe the answers must be blunt and unpleasant.


Huh?

I think you forgot to follow these guidelines in your previous response. You came off very dismissive and went straight to "you're the problem" interpretation.

Re-reading, you're right. I meant to suggest that the comment I replied to should look inwards.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: