Interesting take, the introduction makes it clear it isn't a replacement for actual therapy and if you were to prompt the model, it regularly encourages a user to talk to their loved ones and an actual therapist if they are in a bad state. It's designed as a tool to help people deal with their issues in an affordable and accessible way, similar to journaling. Happy to discuss this with you more if you have a genuine reason to believe this will be harmful given the above.
I love the advice it’s given me. 10/10 I agree with it
> If you believe that your chat bot has no benefit to anyone and may potentially cause harm or confusion, it would be advisable to discontinue its operation. Continuing to run a chat bot that is misleading and potentially harmful goes against ethical guidelines and could have negative consequences for those who interact with it.
The main giveaway when AI is used is that people generally have a predictable pattern in their writing. It's not perfect. But when it is completely absent, it's obviously not human.
I'm sure there is more to it than that, since I'm basing that solely on how some software sniffs out student plagiarism - look for pattern mismatches, then search for them to see if they appear in similar documents elsewhere.
AI content detectors usually operate under the assumption that AI writes even more predictably than humans, who have a level of randomness in factors such as sentence length and word relatability. This program attempts to humanise AI writing by ensuring its patterns are slightly random but not too random, right in that human sweet spot.
But basically say a color is #RRGGBB you could think of these as 3 genes (RR, GG, BB) each of these letters would have their own value. At the moment of reproduction say every "cell" will give half of their genetic material and the other "cell" will give the other half.
Cell 1 (f0, f0, f0):
R11 R12, G11 G12, B11 B12
Cell 2 (e9, e9, e9):
R21 R22, G21 G22, B21 B22
When they reproduce you might have 4 combinations of red, 4 combinations of blue, 4 combinations of green and all together a lot of combinations. (E.g. R11R21, G21G11, B12B22: fe, ef, 09).
The way this works in nature is that our sperm cells have half our genetic material (at random) and the oocite has another half. Which allele is chosen (R11 or R12) is random. There's more complicated processes but that's the basis of genetics.
In your case, I would initialise every cell with a random colour and then when two cells are going to reproduce you just choose one R, one G, one B from one of the cells and same for the other one... then just mix them and you have your "colour". Now, keep in mind that for RGB the first digit is much more important than the second one so #fff is very similar to #f9f9f9. That's something you might want to have in consideration.
Now, with this you will probably see a lot of fun interactions appear. But if you want to go further you can make certain "colors" lethal and you'd see how quickly they disappear out of your pool... :) I hope that gives a good idea.
Wow thanks for this explanation. I'll look into it, might try to add some randomness to the cell behaviour based on genetics. Could make it even more interesting.
