Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | shadowcats's commentslogin

You seem like an interesting fella. Wanna get in touch over email and bounce around some ideas and favorite blogs and such?


Sure! I will send you a mail to the address in your profile.


Related to Edward Norton the actor?


Nope, but I did tell people I was when I was a kid.

Also other fibs: dads owns 'Norton Antivirus', and related to WCW wrestler Scott Norton.


Can this technology be refined?

Someone should do a startup to build devices that allow higher bandwidth communication.


I realize this forum is for technological entrepreneurial pursuits but are you kidding me?

A single MRI costs ~2 million used (Angel Investors are always the hard ones to grab). GE Medical Holding invests more then 1 billion dollars a year in R&D with almost 18 billion a year in revenue. This is like reading up on a Intel Processors and wondering if their is a way for you to personally refine and profit from refining the technology.

Yes there is a chance, but good luck.

Sources: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GE_Healthcare


While I agree about your main point, your costs are a bit out of date. Most brand-new MRI machines cost between $1-3 million with an additional $300-500,000 for the room and ancillary equipment.


But you wouldn't have to use a MRI. In fact a MRI is not practical at all because the patient needs to be inside it to communicate. Much better would be an implantable electrode array. I'm sure they're much cheaper than a MRI too.


Infection is a serious risk with anything implantable, but it would be cool if someone could make it work.


Are people really that good at duping themselves?

Seems metacognition, the ability to reflect on one's own thought process, would be a really good cure for such cognitive dissonance.


Yeah, that is a blatant imbalance.

Why, OP, are you not working as a developer?

Honest question, not trying to be negative or anything.


I have been trying for years. I fail at everything. The thing is this, just knowing how to program and do DOM manipulation isn't good enough. You need to have a stack/framework or 5 that you know like clockwork and as intuitively as a language. I thought by now I would know enough but its really going to be another year of learning node/express/mongoose/mongo/jade/programming patterns/web apis/authentication and god knows what else before the 'big' $20hr checks come rolling in. Seriously , if you don't have enough 'intuitive' understanding of a stack coming into it then you're dead before you've entered the door. Learning a stack is like learning a new language. I have written in PHP but trying to learn CakePHP or any of the other PHP frameworks is a large time investment. I tried Rails and plopped. I've now finally settled on node with express but learning mongoose, ajax w/mongoose and jade in conjunction with api's and storing dom id's and whatever else takes time as building muscle memory is the only route to employment. When I was younger I use to play with drum machines and electronic music equipment a lot and knew certain pieces of it like the back of my hand. The only way I see myself making any real money is to learn a stack literally as well as I knew that music equipment when I was a kid. That means striving to know every granular piece of it....and that takes time.


You don't. You need to set reasonable expectations and approach a coding job as a "new" task instead of one you perceive you've failed at - you probably know more than many intermediate developers but it sounds like your ability to ship code is the biggest problem. Being a programmer doesn't mean knowing the entire stack and each and every piece of it, its about being able to pick out whats important to the task at hand.

I've run into a frequent roadblock in that I always want to know all the elements of what I'm getting into. I'm finding that in MOST cases its not important at all, until you're architecting a new system. Leave that to senior level folks for now, just find a place you can fix or work on UI elements or clear bugs - theres no need to be so stressed about a programming job, just reach for a branch that you can grasp firmly.


OP learned a very valuable lesson: people don't always play fair, and politics/appearances count for a lot in business.

The lesson was learned very cheaply, all things considered.



That's a very interesting article. I'm definitely eyeing that monitor now!


I would of course add "The good parts" by Crockford to the list.

But maybe that is just par for the language course, before one even starts to wants to master Engineering :)

JavaScript: The Good Parts - http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0596517742/ref=as_li_ss_tl?...

Here's a few other good ones:

Functional JavaScript: Introducing Functional Programming with Underscore.js - http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1449360726/ref=as_li_ss_tl?...

Secrets of the JavaScript Ninja - http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/193398869X/ref=as_li_ss_tl?...

Javascript Allongé (free to read online) - https://leanpub.com/javascript-allonge

Javascript Spessore (free to read online, but currently work in progress) - https://leanpub.com/javascript-spessore

Here's a good one about Angular, my favorite framework:

Mastering Web Application Development with AngularJS - http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1782161821/ref=as_li_ss_tl?...

I would of course also recommend the Egghead videos for any Angular aficionados: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLP6DbQBkn9ymGQh2qpk9Im...

PS. The Amazon links are affiliate links.


No one should do anything serious without having read Doug Crockford's Javascript: the good parts. There is a nice OO -language hiding in the closet.


Something that would be cool: implementing X-Windows in JS, using HTML for rendering. So you could run your desktop applications remotely in the browser.

You'd have to tunnel the X protocol somehow to Ajax or Websockets, of course, but that should be quite easy.

Edit: I ran into this: http://blogs.gnome.org/alexl/2011/03/15/gtk-html-backend-upd...


No More Woof in Sweden:

http://www.nomorewoof.com/

http://oresundstartups.com/no-more-woof-aims-read-dogs-minds...

http://www.indiegogo.com/projects/no-more-woof

TLDR: they sell brain-scanning equipment that translates your dog's thoughts into human language.


Robust classification of EEG data from humans in real time in controlled environments (no motion, perfect contact quality, on subjects you can communicate with, etc) is difficult enough. It's part of the R&D that I do now. But on pets? How do you keep them still enough and the sensors seated and wet? Is the classification purely based on unsupervised learning? How the heck does one gather meaningful training data?

My skepto-meter is really pinging on this one. Especially with the flex-funding model.


Is there any evidence this actually works? I see lots of talk but absolutely no demo. Not even a proof of concept demo.


Studio Total (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Studio_Total) who are involved with the product are known to do crazy stuff to get PR, like the 'teddybear airdrop' over Minsk. Some things they make buzz about does not exist yet :)


Damn, that's pretty awesome. Looks pretty legit too. Now to just decode every dogs' actions into what we "think" it means.


Wow! That looks really awesome! Thanks for the tip.


That's crazy ! Add a human-to-dog feature and the duplex is complete


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: