They didn't put Opus 4.5 on the model card to compare

Having used it compared to Nano Banana:

-The latency is still too high, lower than 10 seconds for nano banana and around 25 seconds for GPT image 1.5

-The quality is higher but not a jump like previous google models to Nano Banana Pro. Nano banana pro is still at least equivalently good or better in my opinion.

Gemini 3 in antigravity is significantly better than Claude code with either Opus or Sonnet that I struggle to see how they can compete. And I'm someone with the 100 dollar/month plan.

I can't even use Opus for a day before it runs out before. This will make it better but Antigravity has way better UI and also bug solving.

Gemini 3 in antigravity is amazing

I believe that the fact that Chinese models are beating the crap of of Llama means it's a huge no.

Why? The Chinese are very capable. Most DL papers have at least one Chinese name on it. That doesn't mean they are Chinese but it's telling.

is an american model chinese because chinese people were in the team?

There is no need for that tone here.

OP edited the post.

What are these chinese labs made of?

most papers are also written in the same language, what's your point?

I love the product concept but the fact this person has an almost empty github and suddenly launches an app that can easily be spyware concerns me a lot :). A lot of security concerns with password etc.

Could easily dismiss those concerns by looking at the source code instead of snooping around their profile, especially if you’re on GitHub anyway :)

The way I would do it is I release a open source code without any spyware then prebuilt dmgs that contained it. Thus the lazy people would all get it if they dont self compile. As compiling a new thing takes another 1/2 hour or more for most people, they would be too lazy to do it.

Not saying the author has this intent, but if I was trying to spy on people, I wouldn't include spyware in the initial release...

I think the future with AI has no room for Palantir.

Basically, their entire premise is go into some place, collect all the data and build models that are useful on top that data.

Those models are now pretty much useless in the age of LLMs as the LLMs are so powerful you dont need custom models to predict behavior anymore. The new meta in this space is probably someone taking all the data into some db and using LLM on it either through training or interpretation.

Disagree, almost of all the accomplishments in humanity are driven by people like Steve Jobs not Woz. Elon Musk could be said to be a second iteration, a technical person extremely good at sales that can pursue and sell a vision.

There are a lot of people who want to be happy. Let them be happy, but it's the relentless builders/dreamers who pushes through the entire journey of getting a product out there to the people.

For each Jobs/Musk having the grand vision you probably need a lot of Wozs to actually build the things.

Define "accomplishments". Based on Woz's message, I would say he's been the true achiever in the game of life. He found, what he genuinely believes, is happiness.

Personally, I'd take that over being the creator of something valuable.

If Elon Musk is being held up as a pinnacle of achievement, I don't want that.

Claude code is a poorer version of aider or cline in VScode. I have better results using them than using claude code alone.

Have you upgraded your binary recently. I feel like this was true 1-2 months ago, but not anymore.

Unsure how this comment is relevant