Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | philiac's commentslogin

The article mentions how this compression technique is similar to image compression. Would anyone care to explain, in detail if necessary, how this is so? Thanks.


I think its because a whole bitmap isnt streamed for every new frame, just a diff telling the player about the parts of the map that need updating.


The author seems to desire a needlessly complicated way to make these things happen.


Perhaps converting some of those processes in to shell scripts that invoke libraries which only compile with custom-patched versions of GCC would help. Having the entire set of scripts be solely located in a ZIP file on a tumblr page from 3 years ago would be icing on the cake.


When you're working for a company that has priorities other than you fussing around with your open-source this and open-source that, then naturally the OS X way of doing things becomes easier.

When you're on your own and might appreciate a distraction from the day-to-day coding by, you know, source-patching your open-source media player to fix an irritating bug, the Linux ecosystem provides endless opportunities.

There's a lot to be said for both environments. If you want to be an active participant in building the software you use on a daily basis, Linux is certainly more open in that regard. That's not to say that there aren't a lot of first-class open-source packages on OS X that can be contributed to.


The pathos-heavy articles are not going to disappear; rather, they portend HN's inevitable fate. Camel's nose, etc.


What does RSA stand for? I was on their (SecurID) related site, and checked out the "about" page, but the acronym is never defined.


Initials of the three inventors (discoverers?) of the algorithm: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSA_(algorithm)


(Ron) Rivest, (Adi) Shamir, (Leonard) Adleman


No, but it's not reddit either so if you enjoy this site, be constructive with your comments.


I'm being constructive to zacharyvoase. You can't please everybody with every statement you make without being a sycophant.


> in colloquial use "Mode 7" tends to refer (somewhat inaccurately) to that 3D plane effect.

That is amusing.


I believe he's right, though - I've heard that Mode 7, and specifically the fact that it could simulate a 3D perspective with that effect, was a selling point of the SNES over the Genesis/Megadrive to developers (that, and its higher number of colors). I admittedly haven't played around with Mode 7 much myself.

Apparently Wikipedia has a nice article on it - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mode_7


Oh, I meant I found it amusing that something as obscure as Mode 7 could be referred to "colloquially." I'm in no position to hold an opinion on the intricacies of SNES graphics modes.


It was mentioned on every SNES review back in the day, so at the time it was common knowledge among gamers and enthusiasts.


+1, "Kicking it into mode 7" was one hell of way to spend a Saturday night.

There's no youth like nerd youth.


You mean Arrington's defunct rag?


"It isn't clear if getting someone to believe in your 'extremist philosophy of radical openness' is necessarily a con, unless of course you yourself don't believe in it and/or are doing so only in furtherance of some other interest which you are obscuring."

I do believe this is what Greenspan was getting at.


There is some delicious irony in the embarrassment that is likely caused by Aaron posting these conversations. You know, being 'radically open'.


I thought the same thing. As you see him listing the logs of every Zuckerberg login to houseSYSTEM in the pdf you think "Geez, this is a bit much." And then you consider that sort of snooping is Facebook's core business. They love this sort of information and their engineers have zero conscience about working with it. In fact their logs are probably much more detailed (device, geolocation, etc.) The irony is incredible.


Relevant evidence is not deceitful nor manipulative to disclose.


I never said it was either, I was referring to Zuckerberg, in some ways, being hoisted by his own petard.


"You just quoted Family Guy" - I thought you liked The Simpsons

I don't see how this relates to the rest of the examples.


The implication is that if you enjoy Family Guy, you must not like The Simpsons, while his point is that it is perfectly reasonable that one could enjoy both.


The joke I was making is many people are Simpsons purists and say Family Guy is complete crap.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: