> Justice Clarence Thomas, writing for a majority of five conservative justices, said the federal law that generally shields the Postal Service from lawsuits over missing, lost and undelivered mail includes “the intentional nondelivery of mail.”

Sooooo the entire postal service could just decide to not deliver any mail at all and that's a-okay? How about stealing the contents of mail and keeping/selling them? How about opening mail and stealing valuable information and then not delivering it? How about deliberately not delivering mail ballots to/fro the voter (this is the real real this is happening, and destroying USPS)?

Surprisingly, the USPS is not a target of Project 2025. They must believe it can be destroyed by normal republicans.

Presumably you're not a admin cabinet member or related to one or have inside info from those in the cabinet, which is the key differentiator.

Totally with you on the corruption angle. I was just pointing out that loaning businesses money isn’t inherently evil. I’m also unconvinced anyone I lent to actually wants to go through the trouble and political risk of fighting for a refund.

That won’t matter. Hypocrisy is a given.

The correct default position with this admin is bad faith and/or malice.

If you were developing this site wouldn’t you just develop a formula to calculate the discount? Hate to that’s a typo unless you didn’t do any testing.

Luckily we are able to tos\ spot lazy bs here.

This document is full of all kinds of vile behavior by several men, including Trump (forced oral and penetration on 13-14 yo girls, ...). Hopefully this file was widely downloaded because this file no longer exists on the site.

> I wouldn’t be too surprised if robotaxi replaces 90% of taxis and Ubers in the next 5-7 years

I'd bet a kidney that doesn't happen.

Not Tesla’s version anyway

He didn't specify the year.

He said it's on April 1st [1]. So, yeah.

[1] https://techcrunch.com/2025/11/06/tesla-delays-reveal-of-pro...

On an earnings call, everyone expects it to be this year. Unless specified, it should be this year.

Also, if you compare the entire model line up sales, Tesla isn't even in the top ten in sales. Tesla could disappear entirely and the car industry wouldn't even notice.

But the metric is good since it incentivizes car companies to make 1 good model instead of many different with the intent to confuse buyers

Car buyers are not confused. The market is naturally highly segmented. My needs "every day low distance compact car that can cope with city centre narrow streets with once a month motorway driving" is not met by the same car as "family of 5 with big dog living in a village"

I'm going to go with the fool being followed. At least the following fool realizes that they need guidance, but just chose the wrong leader.

> but regardless we shouldn't be trying imply that intending to overturn elections in cases of fraud is bad in and of itself

The only rational viewpoint is to assume everything this administration does is in bad faith, until proven otherwise.

In the legal realm, journalist and legal analyst Emily Bazelon analyzes the legal "presumption of regularity" which has been trashed by the current administration.