I switched to wired charging with the phone mounted in the same spot and the heat issue went away. Wireless charging produces a lot more heat than wired.
That's really quite interesting. I know the wireless charging uses more power to deliver less power, so there's heat generation due to the loss of power in the transfer (I'm assuming that's how it works).
But, I figured that the battery would heat up more the faster it's being charged, and so wired charging at the same wattage would heat the battery more than wireless charging.
Must be a lot of power->heat transfer loss with wireless charging.
Wait really? I feel like this was happening in the 90s. Now every car has a full gps spy system integrated to the point I barely trust that my conversation is private in a modern vehicle. But I guess if you think it's just your car company, Android, Apple, roadside assistance, the local police, and probably the music you're playing that can pin your location you're probably ok.
Literally all of these can be avoided except the external apparati like the Flock cameras, which is why they're such a big deal.
Getting tracked by your map application or OS platform can be countered by using an open source ROM and a local map provider like OpenStreetMap. Gtting tracked by the car itself can oftentimes be prevented by unplugging the telematics unit (or its antennas) or bypassing it with special cables. But there's nothing you can legally do to protect against the Flock cameras, without ignoring the law entirely and going around town with an angle grinder.
Those weren't his words, and his actual words (which he quoted above, acknowledging their ambiguity) could be (mis)read as meaning that injecting the urine killed the rabbit a few days later, especially since he also wrote "apparently [frogs] could survive the urine injection".
Also, what is the point of a partial disability payment?
Is it to compensate you for the lost income you couldn’t have earned if not for the disability? That would be in line with the goal of normal disability.
Credit cards have better consumer protection than debit cards.
You are on the hook for like $50 max of fraudulent credit card, and like $500 of fraudulent debit. If you don't catch debit in time, you might be liable for all of it.
It's $0 for both credit and debit, under Visa and Mastercard "zero liability" rules.
Even under Regulation E, it would only be $50 as long as the issuer is notified within two days of losing your card, and $0 for other types of fraud (e.g. unauthorized use of your card number online) if reported within 60 days of receiving the corresponding monthly statement.
reply