I'm wondering why these days, when my washing machine has an internet connection, they can't take over control of a plane remotely. I guess it could be considered a security vulnerability, however i'm quite sure it could be done securely.
Like let the pilot eject and you try to land a plane with remote control
That would require even more R&D to maybe be useful in a rare situation. Like you mentioned, the vulnerability surface would increase. The last you thing you'd want is a remote control vuln being discovered in your $200M jet during a conflict.
That and I'm not sure what an ejection actually means for the planes internals i.e. is it even guaranteed the electronic components won't be damaged?
The article said the plane had become uncontrollable and that’s why the pilot had to eject.
So even if remote control was possible I’m not sure it would’ve done any good.
Of course I also don’t know why the plane would be allowed to think that it’s in ground mode when it’s 100s of feet or more in the air. Or why the hydraulic fluid was 1/3 water.
When the plane's software misbehaves due to broken sensors and you only now that, because there are human eyes up there, remote control isn't going to improve the situation.
Going from “I can check my washing machine remotely” to “it should be easy to remotely control fighter jets without any security risks” is quite a leap.
Anyway it’s missing the point. If the pilot can’t adequately control the airplane then a remote operator isn’t going to have a better experience.
I mean, a remote operator could either try to land it in life risking situation, salvaging some of that $200M, or do kamikaze style on a target, both feel quite useful for war situations.
Remote piloting isn't useful for aircraft expected to perform penetrating strike missions against near-peer adversaries. Developing such a capability would be a waste of money.
I am not American, so I don't know the rules of ssn. However, can someone calculate what are the chances I guess a valid ssn, if I know all the ssn rules?
Very good. I don't know all the details but part of the SSN is the hospital ID where you were born, and part of it is time-based. It's just enough that someone trying to drink coffee while perusing the rules won't instantly know everyone's SSN, but a sophisticated actor could probably get someone's SSN down to 100ish guesses.
If there's an inference to be drawn here -- it's probably that fans of LeetCode-style interviewing tend to be not such great teammates for a variety of reasons; not persons from a certain countries.
I always think twice about my revenge and definitely serve it cold. However thinking about it, Inuit are some of the coolest cultures out the here, right next to Japanese. Their commitment to stay cold-headed and be hard working is something to we should all aspire to achieve.
not rly, it is an American study, so it should target Americans, However it is a valid concern/hypothesis that women which give birth younger tend to be of lower health overall due to various socioeconomic conditions.
Ah, but this does not claim to be a study of what age is the optimal for US women to be pregnant in given the current health care system; it supposedly makes a more general claim (or at least, that's what its title says).
