Careful with this if you want to use it for partitioning data (it was atleast true till 9.6 in my experiments). You will never hit the exclusion parameter and consequently end up scanning all the child tables in vain.
Hopefully the partitioning thing is soon fixed 'properly'.
I developed and use(d) pgxplorer (github.com/pgxplorer). So, I can tell you this: the best out there is psql (CLI). There exists no use case where a GUI is better than psql.
Why is this getting downvoted? Please don't downvote if you disagree with this viewpoint. Rust has its reasons for is current form, which is OK! In general, the whole song and dance around GC is a hard problem.
I agree that the syntax is cryptic. I also think that programs are written by humans for human consumption (for accomplishing a certain task).
If you have a long term plan, you might want to factor in the talent pool, hardware cost, and tech debt. For your case, if that leads to Rust, so be it. Or if it means Python, that is fine too.
Likely because it's presented as a rebuttal to the article, when the article makes no such claim. It's a non-sequitur at best, and possibly a straw-man argument.
One way or the other, the company is looking after its interests. You will be reciprocating that when you find something better for yourself. They will understand.
I have quit, folks weren't too pleased, but I kept everything civil and professional. And I was successful in getting a recommendation.
Hopefully the partitioning thing is soon fixed 'properly'.