I’ve seen this cycle before: Delphi promised everyone could write programs. Visual website builders “killed” web development. No-code/low-code tools claimed to change everything.

Now it’s 2026, and the hype is Vibe Coding: describe a feature in plain English, and watch hundreds of lines of code appear per minute. No coding, no engineering—just steering a vibe.

It feels magical. But as someone who’s cleaned up after plenty of “miracles,” here’s the catch: technical debt never disappears, it compounds. AI-generated code is a high-interest loan, and most teams are not ready to pay it back.

I'm curious: How is the community handling AI-generated code, velocity without understanding, and the hidden debt?

They decided that they don't need to handle it, justifications being: some debt is fine, it wont be anything huge, newer AI will handle the debt too eventually, and if the quality suffers, who cares, companies didn't care much about putting out shitty software before either.

If crappy outsourced code was fine by modern standards for companies to churn, somewhat crap AI code will be too.

In the hands of SWEs that understand what to prompt, it's significantly better than overseas code from "seniors" who clearly are juniors being billed at senior rates.

I mean.. technical debt does in fact disappear all the time: you just delete the code.

If you get too stuck on technical debt you will not appreciate all the deleted code that was excellent use of technical debt to validate an idea. When we are annoyed at technical debt because of bad design we are just talking about the surviving products, and with AI coding we can get more of those. Which is a good thing!

Thank you - you've made my day! Last time I felt like that when a lady asked my about the ID at the liquor store :)

The problem is not the cost. It's complexity. From a buyer perspective literally fighting with the procurement team is a nightmare.

And usually the need is coming from someone below C-level. So you have to: convince your manager and his manager convince procurement team it has to be in a budget (and usually it's much easier to convince to pay for the dinner) than you have a procurement team than you need to go through vendor review process (or at least chase execution)

This is reality in all big companies that this rule applies to. It's at least a quarter project.

Once I tried to buy a $5k/yr software license. The Sidekiq founder told me (after two months of back and forth) that he's done and I have to pay by CC (which I didn't had as miserable team lead).