yes

Someone should IARC the internal one.

anything critical of the US regime is almost immediately flagged and downvoted.

it's uh pretty confronting!

yes, obviously?

anyone who is doing serious enough engineering that they have the rule of "one human writes, one human reviews" wants two humans to actually put careful thought in to a thing, and only one of them is deeply incentivised to just commit the code.

your suggestion means less review and worse incentives.

anyone who is doing serious enough engineering is not using LLMS.

just another happy customer, from so long ago I can't find my signup email anymore. very glad there are still companies who just do a thing well without trying to tie me up with them further or cross-sell or sell themselves or make the product worse.

keep up the good work!

100%

if you want anything other than "switch to another full terminal window, no splits, no status bar" then you want tmux or screen or zellij - this tool and the others like it are explicitly avoiding becoming (nested) terminal emulators like tmux and screen and zellij.

at least I think it would be possible to do "switch to another full terminal window, no splits, no status bar" without being a terminal emulator, I haven't tried.

I want to add a `zmx switch` command to detach+reattach to another session. Still thinking through the impl.

for those looking for a simple and reliable self hosted S3 thing, check out Garage . it's much simpler - no web ui, no fancy RS coding, no VC-backed AI company, just some french nerds making a very solid tool.

fwiw while they do produce Docker containers for it, it's also extremely simple to run without that - it's a single binary and running it with systemd is unsurprisingly simple[1].

0: https://garagehq.deuxfleurs.fr/

1: https://garagehq.deuxfleurs.fr/documentation/cookbook/system...

How do you sustain yourselves while developing this project?

What if the sponsorships run out?

What if a company change license, drop the project or goes bankrupt?

You shouldn't expect guarantee of any kind.

> What if a company change license, drop the project or goes bankrupt?

You can always fork the project, then the questions of sponsorships still remains.

Recently Ghostty is a non profit, which means that it is guaranteed not to turn into a for profit and rugpull like what MinIO has done.

That doesn't guarantee the devs stay motivated either.

In the end open source allows motivated people to take over the project if you aren't willing to do it yourself but projects can also die of lack of motivated/paid resources.

it's not interesting at all - the comment is very stupid (jacobin is not "whole journal on literal communism") as well as such lazy both-sidesism everyone is dumber for having read it.

there's lots of stupid brigading on HN, but sometimes dumb comments get the downvotes they deserve.

you should care, he and his fellow nutters have siezed control of the USA and most tech-mega-corp leadership either agree with them or will go along with them.

a perhaps non-obvious option is to CNAME (or NS) the `_acme_challenge` record from your main zone to another zone you can control better and can't affect production traffic the same way the main zone could. `acme-dns` is a neat little tool for exactly this, that has an https api for your ACME client to request a cert from, and a dns server to respond to dns-01 challenges from your provider.

Yeah, I have all my _acme_challenge as their own zone so that BIND can auto increment the serial number without going through the pain of locking/unlocking the entire domain and hoping you don't end up with stale data that stops syncing.

That said, I like that the current system proves that you have control of the domain at the time of renewal, and I'm not sure how setting a one-off token would achieve the same.

Absolutely, this works well. Where it's approved :)