As the earlier poster from Argentina said, pesos are used for the “last mile”. Whoever you’re trading sats for pesos with are likely to be familiar with Lightning and willing to do the trade with it because it’s fast and cheap.
As for the issue of broader adoption, that’s just a matter of education, trust, time, and the right incentives to make the switch in a hyperinflationary environment…
I've read all, and got both interesting points - useful to me angles of view - and certain statements and conclusions from then which I don't agree with.
1) Author says object and data structure are different things basing on stated difference, but doesn't explain why this couldn't be a different point of view on the same thing.
2) When author says "adding a class is easy when you need a new entity, while adding a function is easy when you deal with data structures" he doesn't mention that only "packaging" of code - into switch cases or separate methods - is different. To add Triangle, one still has to add both fields which contain Triangle data and all the methods which work with that data - area, perimeter, center. Similarly, adding data structure "Triangle" also needs all those additions - and only them - but in a different form.
And many derivations from this perceived difference are, um, questionable.
Yet I like author's explanation of impedance mismatch. True, data storage has to satisfy many needs (roughly, we don't want to copy data - normalization), while logic may focus on specific goal at hand.
"If you want to build a ship, don’t drum up the men to gather wood, divide the work, and give orders. Instead, teach them to yearn for the vast and endless sea." -Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
I believe they are attempting to criticise the author's writing style by invoking the stereotype of the neck-beard adorned ültra-geek who tips their fedora to a fair maiden and says, "Milady."
But on the other hand, given that fedoras are (within that context) the most tip-friendly hat, wouldn’t that mean that the author is a natural writer?...
But that’s not really the point though, is it?
As the earlier poster from Argentina said, pesos are used for the “last mile”. Whoever you’re trading sats for pesos with are likely to be familiar with Lightning and willing to do the trade with it because it’s fast and cheap.
As for the issue of broader adoption, that’s just a matter of education, trust, time, and the right incentives to make the switch in a hyperinflationary environment…