Thing is, it wasn't just one incident, it was just one incident that resulted in a death.
When Ubers started self-driving it took just a few hours before there were videos on twitter and youtube of them driving right though red lights without a care in the world.
Let's not give them too much credit here. I think Uber's halt had more to do with Uber's change in CEO and the indictment of the guy who ran their self-driving car program. Plus the fact that it was a giant money sink with no short-term return being run in a company that has never been profitable and can no longer raise infinite investor money.
I don't think it matters whether or not you think Uber was acting responsibly or reflexively. The point is their program is done while Tesla's, which has seen far more fatalities, continues unabated.
It may not matter to you, but it definitely matters to me and to my point about professionals acting professionally. Uber is not a good example of responsible self-regulation; it's instead about them getting reined in by other circumstances.
We've banned this account for repeatedly breaking the site guidelines. Please don't create accounts to do that with—that's against the site guidelines in its own right.
My state gave restaurant owners a billion dollars during the pandemic. A billion dollars.
During the pandemic, restaurants lobbied hard as hell against restrictions and cheated at every opportunity what restrictions they were obliged to follow. Our governor ordered bars to be shut down around 9pm during a surge last year and everyone joked that was great because it meant apparently the 'rona only came out to infect people after 10pm.
I really wanted to meet a prospective date and we wanted to be as safe as possible. We scoured websites, google, and and social media for information about outdoor seating accommodations. Whatever information was available was exceedingly vague, despite it being a year into the pandemic when you'd think any savvy business owner would have information like that readily available. When restaurants had outdoor seating listed as available, most of them had seating fees and some insane minimum order requirements.
> I would rather have nothing but chain restaurants owned by megacorps than have people working for less than a living wage.
Those megacorps do everything they can to pay as little taxes as possible and get as much money out of the country as they can in the form of off-shore corporations that hold the trademarks for said corp, the US subsidiary of which pays it massive 'licensing' fees.
They're also the worst at keeping money within a local economy. They use other large corporations as much as possible for 'efficiency', but it has the side effect of meaning that said business doesn't spend money for services anywhere in the local economy. Joe Drain Buster doesn't get business from Five Guys having a grease clog; some nation-wide plumbing services company does. Maybe they contract out Joe Drain Buster, but not before taking their cut.
It gets worse. The larger the employer the easier it is for that employer to grift the local, county, state, and federal government for freebies, tax breaks, eminent domain gimmes, friendly legislation and regulations, etc.
Witness: Amazon and Walmart. Companies that generated a handful of people with unimaginable wealth who fight tooth and nail to treat their employees like shit.
Jeff Bezos has a net worth of $200BN as of a month ago. The average network for a resident of Mississippi is slightly over $17,000. That means it would take roughly 11.5M Mississippi residents to equal his net worth.
Enforcement isn't a farce, its just focused on workers because employers are powerful and workers aren't.
The reason republicans are so hardline on immigration is because "illegal" workers are really easy to coerce and exploit.
They don't call the health department when you make them shit in a hole in the field. They don't call OSHA when you deny them access to water out in the field. They don't call the attorney general when you pay them by what they pick, or only start counting their hours after they've walked half an hour to the field they're picking, and stop paying them the second they stop picking instead of when they get back to their vehicle...because you're too cheap to provide a truck or bus and they'll walk for free. They don't call the police when one of the supervisors smacks them around for accidentally damaging some equipment. Etc.
> Enforcement isn't a farce, its just focused on workers because employers are powerful and workers aren't.
I don't think many companies are powerful against ICE, especially small restaurants... there are probably political reasons why they choose to target employees and not employers.
Completely agree, this is why where I grew up in TX many of the business owners who are stout conservatives are basically complete hypocrites since they hire illegals! Tbh I strongly advocate to grant citizenship or work visas to people from other countries who want to work, however the democrats still benefit year after year by kicking the dreamers down the road and never actually changing the immigration system.
If we replaced every millenial deadbeat who complains about how hard it is to be a barista with a hard working immigrant our country would be better off!
"Many economists assumed this was the fault of the labor seller for not having skills attractive to buyers"
Given the massive redistribution of wealth in the US for the last half a century it's pretty clear that's not true, and that what's really been going on is businesses have been squeezing "labor sellers" to death.
"If they can't give a decent wage [1] then they were not a viable business to begin with"
Yep. 1000%. If your workers need to be on any form of government assistance, you're being subsidized.
Mr. Factory Owner does all sorts of bullshit like paying unlivable wages, not having any employees working over the number of hours at which they'd have to pay benefits, and so on.
But guess who's always got enough money to donate to republican and libertarian campaigns, and has very strong opinions about 'pulling yourself up by your bootstraps' and how wasteful government assistance is?
What's exceedingly common is an focus on what they think is efficiency (or really, what they see as "waste") which they think makes them a shrewd, smart, savvy business owner.
Distrust in their employees coupled with excessive monitoring on consumables and the like, I think is the most common.
I've patronized, worked at, or know people who worked at places where the employees are doing everything they can to keep a business running despite the owner....often doing what they can to keep said owner from getting their hands too deep into daily operations or in contact with customers.
There's also the fact that Homebrew are a bunch of clowns when it comes to security.
For example, they included their repo github API key in their publicly accessible jenkins site, which meant that anyone could make a commit to the repo, which would be instantly used by anyone going forward:
Buuuut hands-down the real clown-shoe reason nobody should run brew is that it modifies /usr/local to be user-writeable so they can be exceptionally lazy and install everything as the user.
Guess what's at the top of /etc/paths? /usr/local/bin.
Any script or program you run, anyone who sits down at your computer for less than a minute, can pwn you without any fancy hax0r tricks...just by adding a binary or script with the same name as a command from /usr/sbin/ or /usr/bin. You'd likely never know or notice unless you happened to run 'which', get unexpected behavior from said binary/script, or notice weird shit in ps/Activity Monitor. Imagine a script or binary that pretended to be ssh and politely passed along everything to the real ssh binary while also sending your keys, passphrases, etc to a remote host.
When Ubers started self-driving it took just a few hours before there were videos on twitter and youtube of them driving right though red lights without a care in the world.